On October 19, 2020, the EPA issued a Draft Guidance Memorandum on how permitting authorities and permit writers should apply the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decision on the case of the County of Maui vs. the Hawaii Wildlife Fund. A 30-day public comment period was initiated on December 10, 2020.
Related Services
This case involved
Whether discharge from a point source to groundwater that discharged to a “navigable” water would require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The Supreme Court’s decision stated that a point source discharge to groundwater could be the “functional equivalent” of a discharge to a navigable water and could require a NPDES permit. The Court identified seven factors to be evaluated in this determination. The factors include:
- travel time to reach the navigable water;
- distance between the initial discharge to groundwater and navigable water;
- the nature of the subsurface geology through which the pollutant travels;
- the extent to which the pollutant is diluted or chemically changed as it travels;
- the amount of pollutant entering the navigable water relative to the amount of the pollutant that leaves the point source;
- the manner by or area in which the pollutant enters the navigable water; and
- the degree to which the pollution has maintained its specific composition when it enters the navigable water.
Until recently, federal courts were divided on the question of whether a “discharge of a pollutant” subject to the Clean Water Act (CWA) occurs when a pollutant is released from a point source and subsequently moves through groundwater before reaching a “water of the United States (WOTUS).” The US Supreme Court’s decision has not modified the two threshold conditions for triggering NPDES permit applicability from the CWA—(1) an actual discharge of a pollutant to a WOTUS; and (2) the source of the pollution is a point source. If these two conditions are not met, a NPDES permit would not be required. The CWA defines a “point source” as “any discernible, confined and discrete conveyance, including but not limited to any pipe, ditch, channel, tunnel, conduit, well, discrete fissure, container, rolling stock, concentrated animal feeding operation, or vessel or other floating craft, from which pollutants are or may be discharged.”
In situations where discharge may enter groundwater and eventually enter a navigable water, it may be important for the potentially regulated facility to evaluate hydraulic conductivity based on the soil type or porosity; hydraulic gradient through which the pollutant travels; the depth to groundwater; groundwater flow path (including distance and travel time over which the pollutant reaches the receiving WOTUS); and/or pollutant-specific dynamics along the groundwater flow path (e.g., sorption, biological uptake, microbial processing). This evaluation would be necessary to understand not only whether an actual discharge of a pollutant is occurring to a WOTUS via groundwater, but also whether the discharge is the functional equivalent of a direct discharge to a WOTUS. In a typical NPDES permitting process (whether or not groundwater is involved), the facility owner or operator may provide to the permitting agency engineering, modeling or other technical information to support a permit application. These analyses often evaluate the likely fate and transport of pollutants that travel from the point source and into the environment and are often included in the record of decision for a final NPDES permit.
Historically, few NPDES permits have been issued for point source discharges of pollutants that reach WOTUS via groundwater
EPA anticipates that the issuance of such permits will continue to be a small percentage of the overall number of NPDES permits issued once the application of the Supreme Court’s “functional equivalent” analysis to a potential discharge is conducted.
After the end of public comment, EPA finalized the guidance on January 13, 2021. The guidance and additional information can be found at:
https://www.epa.gov/npdes/releases-point-source-groundwater
This guidance memorandum will provide EPA administrative guidance to assist the regulated community and permit writers with incorporating the Maui decision into existing EPA-administered NPDES permit programs and authorized state programs.
Sharing Our Perspectives
Our practitioners share their insights and perspectives on the trends and challenges shaping the market.
Northern Long-Eared Bat: Listing Changed from Threatened to Endangered
December 12, 2022
On November 30, 2022, the United States Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) published a final rule to the Federal Register to change the listing status of the northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) from threatened to endangered.
Managing EHS & ESG Risks Through Integrated Systems Today and Beyond
July 22, 2021
It has been more than 50 years since the development and establishment of the federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the federal Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA) which were formed to protect our environment and workplaces across the United States. Significant laws, policies and regulations followed to establish the “regulatory programs” that all applicable businesses and entities must address and meet to ensure these compliance-driven legislative programs would create a foundation to protect our society.
Interim Guidance on Destruction and Disposal of PFAS & Materials Containing PFAS
February 19, 2021
Interim Guidance from EPA identifies 6 materials that use or manufacture PFAS and approaches for disposal.
EPA Resource Conservation & Recovery Act (RCRA) Corrective Action (CA)
January 11, 2021
The EPA RCRA Corrective Action (CA) Program recently provides a review and update on CA set in 2004 and new CA set for 2030.
Final Guidance from EPA on Applying the U.S. Supreme Court’s Decision on County of Maui vs. Hawaii Wildlife Fund to NPDES Permits
January 4, 2021
On October 19, 2020, the EPA issued a Draft Guidance Memorandum on how permitting authorities and permit writers should apply the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decision on the case of the County of Maui vs. the Hawaii Wildlife Fund. A 30-day public comment period was initiated on December 10, 2020.
New Jersey’s Landmark Environmental Justice Law
November 24, 2020
Renewable energy developers face an increasingly fast moving and competitive market. While opportunities abound, bringing projects online to meet demand comes with many technical and administrative challenges. In this episode of TRC Talks, our experts discuss how TRC’s fully integrated renewables delivery platform is helping move projects from concept to completion, faster and more efficiently.
TRC Companies Inc. Acquires 1Source Safety and Health
November 11, 2020
TRC Companies (“TRC”), a leading technology-driven provider of end-to-end engineering, consulting and construction management solutions, has acquired 1Source Safety and Health, a firm that provides management consulting services in areas such as indoor air quality, asbestos management, industrial hygiene and safety management systems.
Ecological Risk of PFAS from AFFF-Impacted Sites
June 30, 2020
The facts on evaluating exposure to wildlife
