Authors: Joshua Morris and Stephen Taranto | October 18, 2023

Environmental due diligence for property transactions is an incredibly dynamic business process. Though the environmental consultant, buyer, seller and respective legal counsel all have the same overall goal, they may have vastly different motivations and interests. In instances where site-specific data—which is the preferred resource for risk assessment—is not available and completion of a Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (Phase II ESA) is not feasible due to time constraints or access restrictions, consultants are asked to make educated guesses about the environmental risks and associated costs.

When there is a potential vapor intrusion (VI) risk at a subject property and data gaps cannot be filled through a Phase II ESA, there are two options:

  1. Make conservative upper-bound assumptions for the variables influencing vapor migration to estimate the maximum potential problem (e.g., worst case scenario)
  2. Make less conservative (average) assumptions, which estimate the more likely problem

Though using conservative upper-bound and average VI modeling inputs can establish a risk/cost range, it will not tell the transaction stakeholders which end of the range applies to the subject property.

So how to do you most accurately assess the actual conditions at the subject property when you cannot collect site-specific data? How do you fill VI data gaps through a desktop study when the transaction cannot accommodate wait times for open public records requests (e.g., Freedom of Information Act)? This blog explores ways to fill various VI data gaps using information quickly accessible through free online resources or by using other available site-specific plans.

Contaminant Properties, Concentration and Gradients

The contaminants present (or potentially present) at the subject property, as well as their concentrations, will dictate the VI risk for nearby buildings. Contaminants of low volatility or those subject to aerobic degradation pose a lower risk to indoor air, as their vapors are less likely to migrate far from the source. Similarly, contaminants that do not have inhalation toxicity values are not considered sufficiently toxic to pose a VI concern.

Right-to-know filings available online from regulatory agencies can help establish the contaminants that may be present at and near the subject property. Environmental reports submitted for sites in the area provide even more detailed information about potential contaminants present and are accessible from online document libraries curated by regulatory agencies.

Understanding potential sources, and knowing the source concentrations and gradients, will provide clues as to the overall extent of the source, which dictates the extent of the elevated risk to indoor air. Vertical concentration gradients may also demonstrate that conditions that preclude an elevated VI risk are present (e.g., presence of a clean lens of shallow groundwater between the building and the subsurface contamination), as well as whether conditions are suitable for aerobic biodegradation.

e7df91e7-in-the-grass-there-are-light-bulbs-1345611854

Learn More From Our Technical Experts

TRC’s Center of Research and Expertise (CORE) is a multidisciplinary team led by proven subject matter experts in over 30 specialized technical areas. Our monthly CORE newsletter shares valuable insights on emerging technologies, significant challenges and innovative solutions present in many industries across the world. Our experts also share how they use their unique skills and experience to solve client issues and support our communities and the environment.

Sign Up Today

Subsurface Permeability

The potential for sub-slab vapors to migrate into indoor air is closely related to the soil type and permeability of the underlying soil/bedrock—most important of which is the soil layer just beneath the building. Environmental or geotechnical reports for nearby sites that were submitted to local government agencies and posted online for public review, as well as geologic/hydrogeologic maps published by state and federal agencies (e.g., United States Geological Survey [USGS]) can provide useful permeability data.

If that information is not available, environmental regulatory agencies that promulgate VI cleanup standards or investigation screening levels use assumed values for geologic/hydrogeologic conditions based on typical conditions within the jurisdiction or use conservative “worst-case” values when establishing the standards (e.g., sand is most conservative with respect to vapor migration). A review of the basis and background documents posted on these agencies’ websites can yield information about permeability assumptions used to calculate the numeric values of the standards or screening levels. This can provide insight into the potential permeability in the area or the applicability of default standards or screening levels to the subject property.

GettyImages-140476642-1-scaled

Groundwater Depth

The distance between a VI source (e.g., a dissolved volatile organic compounds [VOCs] groundwater plume) and the overlying building(s) can affect the ability of sub-slab contaminants to migrate into indoor air. Some contaminants (e.g., petroleum-related VOCs) show a propensity to naturally attenuate in the unsaturated soil zone. As such, depth to groundwater can be an important indicator to rule out the risk to the overlying buildings. Environmental or geotechnical reports submitted for zoning or construction approval for nearby sites, as well as geologic/hydrogeologic maps published by state and federal agencies (e.g., USGS) may provide this regional data. If those types of reports are not available, local agencies’ regulatory basis and background documents may also contain information about groundwater depth assumptions used to calculate the numeric values of the standards or screening levels.

Attenuation Factor

In some situations, site-specific VI studies from nearby sites may be available, especially in cases where the subject property was part of a larger development with neighboring properties built contemporaneously and with similar construction. These reports, which are increasingly available from many regulatory agencies via online libraries, can contain firm data for vapor migration potential given the actual underground conditions at and near the subject property. Data from radon studies completed for the subject property may also provide attenuation factors from sub-slab soil gas to indoor air in the on-site buildings.

GettyImages-1731167699
GettyImages-1944772735

Building Construction, Use, and Exposure Duration

Buildings form the primary engineering control to prevent vapor migration from the subsurface into indoor air; therefore, building construction and condition are important factors when assessing VI risk. The thickness and condition of the floor slab, the presence of porous sub-slab layers, and even usage factors, such as occupancy and the heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) operation can all dictate how much of the sub-slab contamination is able to migrate into the occupied spaces and what the resultant human exposure could be. Regulatory basis and background documents can be used as reference points for standard assumptions regarding floor thickness, air exchange rate and building size, and assumed exposure scenarios (e.g., residential vs. non-residential). This information can be compared to subject property building construction or use plans.

For example, over-pressurization of the building interior via HVAC system can cause reverse pressure gradients, which will prevent the flow of contaminant vapors into the building. Conversely, a newer building may be more prone to settling, which can cause separation of floor slab seams and lead to increased contaminant migration into the building over time. Building engineering plans and proposed changes in usage will provide information necessary to allow the transaction stakeholders to assess VI risk.

Preferential Pathways

Construction of subsurface structures, such as sumps, French drains, elevator shafts, utility corridors or penetrations, or fracture zones within bedrock geologic units, may serve as preferential VI pathways. The higher relative permeability of the preferential pathway can channel vapor migration along specific pathways, creating anisotropic migration patterns. Understanding preferential vapor migration pathways can identify potential VI risks to buildings far away from a contaminant source. Construction plans for roadways and developed properties may be posted online by local governments and contain information on proposed or built utility corridors. Geologic maps of bedrock type and surfaces published by State and Federal governments can help determine if the subject property and associated building(s) are subject to preferential vapor migration through bedrock fractures.

Solving the Puzzle

While theoretical information can never measure up to site-specific analytical data collected from a subject property, it can bridge the gap between uncertainty and an informed estimate. An informed estimate in turn allows the buyer/seller to make their own educated business decisions. The end result is a technically sound solution from which both the buyer and the seller walk away satisfied in both the deal and the guidance provided by their environmental consultant. TRC has the VI, transaction advisory, and due diligence knowledge and experience to the provide the sound guidance and advice needed during the transaction process. Whether you need VI experts or just have some preliminary questions, TRC professionals are always ready to assist.

Gain
Peace-of-Mind

Partner With TRC’s Tested Practitioners

Contact Us

Sharing Our Perspectives

Our practitioners share their insights and perspectives on the trends and challenges shaping the market.

01-risk-assessments-for-your-environmental-permit
Insights

Risk Assessments for Your Environmental Permit

February 1, 2024

Environmental risk assessments help protect facilities, workers and the environment. Learn more about the importance of environmental risk assessments today.

c62c3db2-engineers-discussing
Insights

Filling Vapor Intrusion Data Gaps During Property Transaction Due Diligence

October 18, 2023

Environmental due diligence for property transactions is an incredibly dynamic business process

GettyImages-964949996
Insights

Environmental Site Assessments for Forest and Rural Properties

July 25, 2023

Key considerations for leveraging ASTM E2247 vs. E1527

0e9da657-gettyimages-1281497836
Insights

The Rise of Agrivoltaics

July 18, 2023

This article explores the tensions between traditional agriculture and solar development, as well as the financial benefits for farmers who lease their land for solar projects.

Petrochemical-Plant-Illuminated-at-Dusk
Regulatory Updates

Changes to EPA’s Risk Management Program (RMP) Regulations Are Coming

April 14, 2023

Changes to the Risk Management Program (RMP) regulations were signed into a final rule on February 27, 2024, by EPA Administrator Michael S. Regan.

badabb4a-engineers-showing-his-colleagues-online-data-in-tablet-1207928632
Insights

Routinely Evaluating the Health & Effectiveness of Integrated Systems to Manage EHS/ESG Risks – Part 2

March 15, 2023

Systematic monitoring and continuous improvement is important to achieve an effective EHS/ESG management system within an organization.

power-transformer
Regulatory Updates

Deadline Approaching for Utilities to Report SF₆ Emissions to EPA

March 8, 2023

The EPA regulates greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions under the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) and has recently decided to place renewed emphasis on sulfur hexafluoride (SF₆).

3256d36b-woman-labor-and-factory-exterio-858529688
Insights

Recognizing, Identifying, Prioritizing and Addressing EHS & ESG Risks

March 3, 2023

A clear view and understanding of the environmental, health and safety (EHS) risks created by a business is paramount to its success and longevity.

2612967a-two-heavy-industry-engineers-1290244410
Insights

Routinely Evaluating the Health & Effectiveness of Integrated Systems to Manage EHS/ESG Risks – Part I

March 1, 2023

Once established, an EHS/ESG management system must be routinely evaluated to ensure it remains effective to identify and control risks, as well as accommodate and adjust for changes that occur to/within the organization.

d53561b9-trc-core-technical-resources-hero-1440x810-1
Resources

ASTM Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Updates

February 1, 2023

Environmental due diligence is the first step in identifying potential environmental liabilities prior to the acquisition of real estate or business transfers.

esa-standard
Regulatory Updates

Phase I ESA ASTM Standard Update: The Wait is Over

December 21, 2022

The USEPA published a Final Rule making the ASTM E1527-21 Phase I ESA standard AAI compliant.

b585ce4f-ehs-white-paper-blog-e1677870757155
Insights

Optimizing EHS/ESG Information Management and Reporting Systems by Leveraging Innovative Digital Technology Solutions

August 10, 2022

A single, integrated enterprise wide EHS/ESG IMS can significantly improve performance and communicate progress towards organizational requirements and goals.

ec76f926-july-core-newsletter-image
Insights

Regulatory Compliance Items to Consider as Part of Transactional Due Diligence

July 19, 2022

Performing a limited environmental regulatory review can identify potential deficiencies with the environmental management of an acquisition.

c20ba008-microsoftteams-image-18
Insights

Support an Integrated EHS/ESG Management System

June 10, 2022

While a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) is a common method for identifying environmental liabilities during transactional due diligence, the ASTM International standard for Phase I ESAs (E1527-13, with proposed E1527-21 awaiting adoption) omits regulatory compliance from its scope. For properties containing operations that may be applicable to environmental compliance regulations, performing a limited environmental regulatory review can identify potential deficiencies with the environmental management of the facility. A limited environmental compliance review typically evaluates the presence of material findings that may exist in a facility’s management of its environmental compliance requirements. Material findings are defined as a condition of non-compliance that could necessitate expenditures, not including attorney fees or regulatory agency penalties, in excess of a specified dollar amount or materiality threshold. The materiality threshold is based on the client’s risk tolerance and is often in the range of $50,000. However, this amount is arbitrary and can be revised as appropriate. Non-material deficiencies, those identified below the materiality threshold, would still require action but are within the client’s risk tolerance.

b517ce45-manage-ehs-esg-risks-blog
Insights

How to Use an Integrated Approach To Manage EHS and ESG Risks

April 20, 2022

While a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) is a common method for identifying environmental liabilities during transactional due diligence, the ASTM International standard for Phase I ESAs (E1527-13, with proposed E1527-21 awaiting adoption) omits regulatory compliance from its scope. For properties containing operations that may be applicable to environmental compliance regulations, performing a limited environmental regulatory review can identify potential deficiencies with the environmental management of the facility. A limited environmental compliance review typically evaluates the presence of material findings that may exist in a facility’s management of its environmental compliance requirements. Material findings are defined as a condition of non-compliance that could necessitate expenditures, not including attorney fees or regulatory agency penalties, in excess of a specified dollar amount or materiality threshold. The materiality threshold is based on the client’s risk tolerance and is often in the range of $50,000. However, this amount is arbitrary and can be revised as appropriate. Non-material deficiencies, those identified below the materiality threshold, would still require action but are within the client’s risk tolerance.

esa-standard
Regulatory Updates

New Phase I ESA Standard Will Affect Environmental Due Diligence

January 25, 2022

After years of review, revisions and discussions, the new ASTM E1527 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Phase I ESA) standard has been published. The new standard includes updates to definitions, clarifications on processes and requirements, and guidance for emerging contaminants.

GettyImages-2155903870
White Papers / Reports

Managing EHS & ESG Risks Through Integrated Systems Today and Beyond

July 22, 2021

It has been more than 50 years since the development and establishment of the federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the federal Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA) which were formed to protect our environment and workplaces across the United States. Significant laws, policies and regulations followed to establish the “regulatory programs” that all applicable businesses and entities must address and meet to ensure these compliance-driven legislative programs would create a foundation to protect our society.

2f472652-bristol-uk-banner
Insights

Environmental Impacts of Transitioning to Renewables

May 15, 2021

The transition to renewable energy sources will have notable environmental impacts as well as economic impacts. To understand the possible implications, you’ll need some background knowledge of the ways fossil fuels affect the environment.

GettyImages-509848898
Insights

Controlling volatile organic emissions from RCRA hazardous waste activities

May 14, 2021

EPA identifies National Compliance Initiative FY2020-2023 for reducing hazardous air emissions from hazardous waste facilities.

140de023-trc-pfas-sampling-advisory-on-aqueous-samples
Insights

PFAS Sampling Advisory on Aqueous Samples

April 1, 2021

Advisory on collecting aqueous samples (e.g., groundwater, wastewater, stormwater, etc.) for PFAS analysis.

GettyImages-1367487978-1
Regulatory Updates

Interim Guidance on Destruction and Disposal of PFAS & Materials Containing PFAS

February 19, 2021

Interim Guidance from EPA identifies 6 materials that use or manufacture PFAS and approaches for disposal.

GettyImages-1472604391
Insights

EPA Issues PFAS Air Emissions Draft Test Method OTM-45

February 5, 2021

First Air Emissions Draft Test for the Measurement of Selected Per- and Polyfluorinated Alkyl Substances from Stationary Sources

GettyImages-177332436-a
News

TRC Companies Inc. Expands Environmental and Renewable Energy Capabilities with the Acquisition of Shoener Environmental

December 2, 2020

Today TRC Companies, announces the expansion of its environmental and renewable energy capabilities with the acquisition of Shoener Environmental.

GettyImages-1461816895
Videos

TRC Talks – Renewable Energy

November 24, 2020

Our experts discuss TRC’s integrated approach to renewable energy development.

GettyImages-525440707-a
News

TRC Companies Inc. Acquires 1Source Safety and Health

November 11, 2020

TRC Companies (“TRC”), a leading technology-driven provider of end-to-end engineering, consulting and construction management solutions, has acquired 1Source Safety and Health, a firm that provides management consulting services in areas such as indoor air quality, asbestos management, industrial hygiene and safety management systems.

a7a80602-jm_headshot
Joshua Morris

Josh Morris is a TRC Project Manager and Due Diligence and ISRA Specialist with 11 years of experience based in Northern New Jersey. He and his team assist clients with environmental due diligence (i.e., Phase I Environmental Site Assessments and Preliminary Assessments), transaction advisory services and compliance with New Jersey’s Industrial Site Recovery Act (ISRA) and Site Remediation Program. Contact Josh at jmorris@trccompanies.com.

f6eae0fb-stephen-taranto
Stephen Taranto

Mr. Taranto has over 22 years of experience with environmental investigations associated with site remediation projects, leaking underground storage tanks (USTs) and environmental due diligence investigations associated with property transactions and is familiar with several platforms for collecting field data electronically. His work on these projects includes field sampling, remedial action oversight, evaluation of per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) use, Licensed Site Remediation Professional (LSRP) services and project management tasks. Mr. Taranto is familiar with the evaluation of the potential and actual impact of contamination on nearby receptors (direct contact, groundwater, vapor intrusion and ecological pathways) and compliance with notification and public outreach requirements. Contact Mr. Taranto at STaranto@trccompanies.com.