May 6, 2022

As an investor screening tool, ESG frameworks determine the willingness of investors to buy shares in a company. Thus, poor environmental scores within ESG criteria could mean fewer investors. Fewer investors hinder a company’s ability to thrive and overcome obstacles. This article examines ESG environmental criteria and how companies can optimize their ESG strategy.

What Is the “Environmental” in ESG?

The “environmental” in the ESG approach measures a company’s environmental responsibility. All activities across a company’s direct operations and supply chains are relevant for ESG environmental evaluations. ESG criteria evaluate both outputs — what and how much a company produces — and inputs — what and how much they use to sustain production.

While not exhaustive nor unique to ESG environmental factors, some cursory evaluative factors with ESG environmental criteria include:

  • Carbon footprint and sustainability practices
  • Material disposal and waste
  • Future environmental goals
  • Corporate climate policies
  • Use of natural resources
  • Treatment of animals
  • Pollution metrics

There are also industry-specific evaluative factors, which often apply to the medical, utility and food industries.

Contact Us

GettyImages-1310119608-1

How Do You Choose the Right ESG Performance Metrics?

In the environmental sector alone, there are many ESG performance metrics. With so many performance metrics, it becomes unrealistic for companies to give 100% of their attention to each metric. In some cases, specific metrics will be more relevant to a company’s operations than others. Thus, it’s essential to know what metrics to focus on, but they’re not always clear.

It takes expert analysis to decipher essential ESG performance metrics from bonus metrics that provide an edge over the competition and metrics that are somewhat irrelevant to company operations. Still, ESG reporting standards are becoming stricter. Investors interpret clear, consistent company reporting as signs of transparency and accountability. As such, choosing the right ESG performance metrics involves more than posturing or saying the right thing at the right time. Companies must take an active role in engaging with environmental issues and determine their role in mitigating them.

One strategy for choosing the right ESG performance metrics is paying attention to pillar environmental concerns. Such pillars group performance indicators together, distilling ultimate aims and finding common denominators between them. It’s also beneficial to pay close attention to the data points and frameworks your stakeholders focus on.

Paying attention to pillar concerns and stakeholder interests prevents companies from getting bogged down by the minutiae of each metric. By scaling out, companies can highlight relevant operational KPIs before scaling in to optimize their ESG score. In this way, companies can give greater intention and care to the metrics relevant to their operations and stakeholder interests.

CONTINUE READING HERE

Guide to Possible ESG Environmental KPIs

Here are some environmental pillars and specific environmental KPIs to consider when determining which ESG environmental performance metrics to focus on.

Environmental pillars come in different formulations, depending on the priorities of those who codify them. However, here are three fundamental pillars for ESG environmental performance metrics:

  • Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions: GHG emissions are foundational to assessing your carbon footprint. They damage the climate by trapping heat close to the earth’s surface, contributing to global warming and poor air quality. Carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide are the primary greenhouse gases released during fossil fuel combustion. Companies can develop effective carbon reduction strategies and reasonable cost estimates for optimizing their ESG score by taking inventory of GHG emissions.
  • Land protection: Land trusts guard land with rich biodiversity from industrial development or devastation. Depending on a company’s industry, this pillar may be more or less relevant. Companies that produce much waste or plan to develop or extract resources from biodiverse areas need to consider this pillar more than companies with minimal waste and sustainable development. Land protection also has implications for ESG social criteria, such as indigenous land rights.
  • Water use: This pillar is easy to overlook but requires careful reflection. Water insecurity is rapidly increasing across the world. Water crises are ranked fourth on the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) Global Risk Report, behind weapons of mass destruction, failure of climate change mitigation and extreme weather risks. According to the United States Geological Survey, industries that produce chemicals, gasoline, metals, oils, paper and wood use the most water.

Understanding the ESG environmental pillars can make prioritizing specific environmental KPIs more manageable. Of those KPIs, here are some companies commonly encounter:

  • Energy consumption and efficiency: This metric determines a company’s total energy consumption across direct operations and supply chains. Energy efficiency is based on total consumption and the extent of company operations. Energy consumption includes process and assembly, heating and cooling, lighting and other industry-specific factors.
  • GHG emissions: Another environmental KPI is a company’s total GHG emissions. Contributing factors to a company’s GHG emissions include transportation, electricity production and chemical reactions from raw material processing.
  • Energy use per facility and enterprise-level: This metric breaks down energy consumption across a company’s different facilities and operations. It outlines where they score well with energy efficiency and where they have room to improve.
  • Ratio of expected energy saved to actual use: This KPI measures how efficient a company’s energy strategies are.
  • Greenhouse emissions from energy used: This metric involves indirect GHG emissions, which are emissions from purposes indirectly related to a company’s primary operations. Such emissions include burning fossil fuels for heating and other energy needs.
  • Waste creation: The amount, type and disposal methods of waste a company creates are relevant to environmental ESG criteria. Construction industries make the most waste, but textile manufacturers make much more toxic waste. So, it’s a matter of how much as well as what type of waste is created and what is done with it.
  • Value added to the economy through cost avoidance: This KPI concerns a company’s ability to continue adding economic value while adhering to sustainable practices. It examines how economically innovative the solutions are to determine if the investment is worthwhile.
  • Applicable laws governing environmental responsibility: Adhering to local, state and federal laws regulating a company’s environmental impact affects ESG performance. Taking environmental risks harms ESG scores.

Achieve New
Possibilities

Partner With TRC’s Tested Practitioners

Contact Us

Get Support With Your ESG Strategy From TRC

There are many moving parts to consider when managing a company’s finances. Besides providing consistent financial reportage, CFOs must know where to invest while determining best practices for managing company debt, equity and capital structure. With that responsibility, it’s challenging to devote enough attention to developing an effective ESG strategy. Our global consulting firm at TRC can help you develop an environmentally conscious ESG strategy. Contact one of our ESG experts today to get started!

CONTACT US

GettyImages-1282082558

Related Materials

Sharing Our Perspectives

Our practitioners share their insights and perspectives on the trends and challenges shaping the market.

64d83b40-dark-blue-waves-in-the-water-1253853268
Regulatory Updates

U.S. EPA and Army Corps of Engineers to Develop Revised Rule to Define “Waters of the United States”

August 8, 2023

The US EPA and Army Corps of Engineering are redefining “Waters of the United States”.

fbc268c2-past_www_header
Resources

Virginia Water and Wastewater Rate 2023 Report is Now Available

July 24, 2023

Keys to a successful technical impracticability evaluation are sound data collection, documentation and effective communication of site conditions and groundwater restoration potential.

bc957284-gettyimages-1279337923
News

TRC Assists in Securing $11M in funding for small Communities

April 14, 2023

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) and United States Department of the Army Corps of Engineers (U.S. ACOE) are redefining “waters of the United States (WOTUS).” A new Rule is expected to be finalized by September 1, 2023, and will address the May 25, 2023, U.S. Supreme Court decision in Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency. In the interim, the U.S. EPA and U.S. ACOE will interpret the phrase “waters of the United States” consistent with the Supreme Court’s decision in Sackett.

54f295dc-comprehensive-air-quality-assistance-photo
Resources

Vapor Intrusion Assessment and Mitigation Case Study

February 23, 2023

Keys to a successful technical impracticability evaluation are sound data collection, documentation and effective communication of site conditions and groundwater restoration potential.

04d8ea53-wastewater_photo
Insights

Integrating Sustainability, Digital Connectivity and Design Optimization in Wastewater Treatment Systems

June 20, 2022

Some organizations rarely think about water and wastewater treatment, until there is a problem. American industry depends on the ability to treat wastewater discharges while complying with regulatory standards and addressing emerging contaminants. If wastewater treatment fails, our environment is negatively impacted, and companies are exposed to shutdowns, delays and fines.

CCR-Groundwater-Compliance-and-Monitoring
Insights

Controlling PFAS Discharge to Surface Water (PFAS-Trapping Cap)

February 15, 2022

Controlling PFAS in discharge water is critical for the management and protection of aquatic life.

water-beaker
Insights

Need help collecting PFAS samples for NJDEP deadline December 15?

October 7, 2021

NJDES Category B or L Industrial Permit holders – If you haven’t obtained your first PFAS sample yet, time is running out. All New Jersey Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NJDES) Category B or L Industrial Permit holders are required by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Projection (NJDEP) to collect two representative effluent samples, taken 30 days apart, to be analyzed for PFAS by an approved laboratory and submitted to them by December 15, 2021.

8b0162b3-epa-solicits-comments-on-pfas-discharges
Regulatory Updates

EPA Solicits Comments on PFAS Discharges in Five Point Source Categories

September 23, 2021

EPA solicits comments in five point source categories (PSCs) in the manufacture, use, treatment and discharge of PFAS.

efb68b7f-trc-epa_ramps_up_inspections_and_enforcement_actions
Regulatory Updates

EPA Ramps Up Inspections and Enforcement Actions

May 14, 2021

EPA’s acting enforcement chief, Larry Starfield, directs agents to ramp up inspections in communities known to be afflicted by pollution

140de023-trc-pfas-sampling-advisory-on-aqueous-samples
Insights

PFAS Sampling Advisory on Aqueous Samples

April 1, 2021

Advisory on collecting aqueous samples (e.g., groundwater, wastewater, stormwater, etc.) for PFAS analysis.

GettyImages-1216409748-1
Insights

The View on Climate Change has Changed in Washington

March 1, 2021

The Biden Administration signals both a renewed and accelerated focus on climate change.

GettyImages-525440707-a
News

TRC Companies Inc. Acquires 1Source Safety and Health

November 11, 2020

TRC Companies (“TRC”), a leading technology-driven provider of end-to-end engineering, consulting and construction management solutions, has acquired 1Source Safety and Health, a firm that provides management consulting services in areas such as indoor air quality, asbestos management, industrial hygiene and safety management systems.

Snipe at the edge of the swamp

Ecological Risk of PFAS from AFFF-Impacted Sites

June 30, 2020

The facts on evaluating exposure to wildlife

49d320b3-refinery-at-sunset-637140248-b

TRC’s Reporting Tool Can Help Identify New PFAS under the TRI

May 19, 2020

While utilities often work in technical silos, NERC auditors are trained to cross check compliance evidence and data between interrelated standards.

f97d4b92-trc-impacts-epa-wotus
Regulatory Updates

Potential Impacts from EPA’s Proposed Waters of the United States Rule

July 24, 2019

The EPA is redefining which bodies of water are eligible for protection under the federal Clean Water Act – and which ones aren’t.

GettyImages-1480826401-a
News

TRC Acquires California Construction Management Firm Vali Cooper & Associates

June 26, 2018

LOWELL, Mass. – TRC, a leading provider of end-to-end engineering, consulting and construction management solutions fueled by innovative technology, announced today it has acquired Vali Cooper & Associates Inc., a top California infrastructure firm that manages transportation, water/wastewater, utility and facilities projects.

GettyImages-177551521
Insights

Michigan Steps Up Fight Against PFAS Contamination

May 8, 2018

Michigan is cracking down on PFAS contamination with a pair of new regulatory actions aimed at protecting the state’s water supply.