Authors: Dr. Rachel Velthusien | février 19, 2021

On December 18, 2020, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued its Interim Guidance on the Destruction and Disposal of Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances [PFAS] and Materials Containing Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (Interim Guidance), as directed under the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (NDAA FY2020).

The Interim Guidance identifies six (6) material types – 1) solid, liquid, or gas waste streams from facilities that manufacture or use PFAS, 2) aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), 3) soils & biosolids, 4) textiles, 5) spent water treatment materials (activated carbon, ion exchange resins, high pressure membranes), and 6) landfill leachate – in which the EPA describes technologies that may be used for destruction or disposal of associated PFAS. The Interim Guidance does not provide a specific recommendation on what technologies to utilize but rather lays out the additional research that is needed before concrete guidance can be provided. In addition, the Interim Guidance does not establish PFAS concentrations that would necessitate destruction or disposal for these six (6) material types. The Interim Guidance does, however, provide insight into the different existing technologies and techniques currently being explored for destruction or disposal of PFAS.

The EPA tentatively recommends four (4) different approaches as summarized below in order of uncertainty (lowest to highest) for disposal of PFAS

  • Held in or placed in interim storage – Although the Interim Guidance does not detail the specifics for storage, it does note the use of best management practices for storage. This approach does not destroy the PFAS and thus, other options may become more important as more information is obtained.
  • Injection into deep wells – There are a limited number of deep wells currently able to receive liquid-phase PFAS, and location, waste transportation, and associated costs may significantly limit practicability.
  • Disposal in Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Subtitle C permitted hazardous waste landfills – These sites are already known to have the “most stringent environmental controls” for hazardous waste management.
  • Placed in solid waste landfills – If sites have composite liners and leachate collection treatment systems.

Two other potential options that are being considered having greater uncertainty than those listed above are hazardous waste combustors and other thermal treatment devices. These units, which include hazardous waste incinerators (HWIs), cement kilns, lightweight aggregate kilns (LWAKs), boilers, carbon reactivation units, sewage sludge incinerators, municipal waste combustors, thermal oxidizers, and hydrogen chloride (HCl) production furnaces that burn hazardous waste, typically achieve 99.99% destruction for non-PFAS air pollutants. It is expected that all of these sources would be subject to Clean Air Act (CAA) permitting requirements which may include air emission limitations, source testing, and/or recordkeeping requirements. However, the uncertainty these units have for destruction of PFAS is due to concerns about the products of incomplete combustion (PICs) and release of non-PFAS pollution (such as other combustion pollutants). The Interim Guidance does not provide detail as to which PICs are of greatest concern or what to do about them, nor does it address the risks associated with PIC air emissions. However, the EPA is actively working to conduct research and gather information to conclude whether PICs are adequately controlled.

Overall, the EPA’s Interim Guidance document concluded that more research is needed to reach recommendations on method of destruction to use, what the PICs are, and how to mitigate them. EPA’s Interim Guidance will be updated every three years as required under the NDAA FY2020. In addition, EPA is actively exploring other novel disposal technologies beyond the established approaches discussed in the Interim Guidance.

The comment period for the Interim Guidance document closed on February 22, 2021. TRC will monitor the docket for comments and provide an update when EPA issues further or final guidance.

TRC’s Air Management Services consulting group provides critical air quality support for facilities faced with challenges related to PFAS air emission testing, quantification, and permitting of applicable control devices.

Embrassez le changement

Collaborez avec les praticiens testés de TRC

Contact Us

Partager nos perspectives

Nos praticiens partagent leurs idées et leurs points de vue sur les tendances et les défis qui façonnent le marché.

01-risk-assessments-for-your-environmental-permit
Aperçus

Évaluations des risques pour votre permis environnemental

février 1, 2024

Les évaluations des risques environnementaux aident à protéger les installations, les travailleurs et l’environnement. Apprenez-en plus sur l’importance des évaluations des risques environnementaux dès aujourd’hui.

c62c3db2-engineers-discussing
Aperçus

Filling Vapor Intrusion Data Gaps During Property Transaction Due Diligence

octobre 18, 2023

Environmental due diligence for property transactions is an incredibly dynamic business process

GettyImages-964949996
Aperçus

Environmental Site Assessments for Forest and Rural Properties

juillet 25, 2023

Key considerations for leveraging ASTM E2247 vs. E1527

0e9da657-gettyimages-1281497836
Aperçus

The Rise of Agrivoltaics

juillet 18, 2023

This article explores the tensions between traditional agriculture and solar development, as well as the financial benefits for farmers who lease their land for solar projects.

Petrochemical-Plant-Illuminated-at-Dusk
Mises à jour réglementaires

Changes to EPA’s Risk Management Program (RMP) Regulations Are Coming

avril 14, 2023

Changes to the Risk Management Program (RMP) regulations were signed into a final rule on February 27, 2024, by EPA Administrator Michael S. Regan.

badabb4a-engineers-showing-his-colleagues-online-data-in-tablet-1207928632
Aperçus

Routinely Evaluating the Health & Effectiveness of Integrated Systems to Manage EHS/ESG Risks – Part 2

mars 15, 2023

Systematic monitoring and continuous improvement is important to achieve an effective EHS/ESG management system within an organization.

power-transformer
Mises à jour réglementaires

Deadline Approaching for Utilities to Report SF₆ Emissions to EPA

mars 8, 2023

The EPA regulates greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions under the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) and has recently decided to place renewed emphasis on sulfur hexafluoride (SF₆).

3256d36b-woman-labor-and-factory-exterio-858529688
Aperçus

Recognizing, Identifying, Prioritizing and Addressing EHS & ESG Risks

mars 3, 2023

A clear view and understanding of the environmental, health and safety (EHS) risks created by a business is paramount to its success and longevity.

2612967a-two-heavy-industry-engineers-1290244410
Aperçus

Routinely Evaluating the Health & Effectiveness of Integrated Systems to Manage EHS/ESG Risks – Part I

mars 1, 2023

Once established, an EHS/ESG management system must be routinely evaluated to ensure it remains effective to identify and control risks, as well as accommodate and adjust for changes that occur to/within the organization.

d53561b9-trc-core-technical-resources-hero-1440x810-1
Ressources

ASTM Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Updates

février 1, 2023

Environmental due diligence is the first step in identifying potential environmental liabilities prior to the acquisition of real estate or business transfers.

esa-standard
Mises à jour réglementaires

Phase I ESA ASTM Standard Update: The Wait is Over

Décembre 21, 2022

The USEPA published a Final Rule making the ASTM E1527-21 Phase I ESA standard AAI compliant.

b585ce4f-ehs-white-paper-blog-e1677870757155
Aperçus

Optimizing EHS/ESG Information Management and Reporting Systems by Leveraging Innovative Digital Technology Solutions

août 10, 2022

A single, integrated enterprise wide EHS/ESG IMS can significantly improve performance and communicate progress towards organizational requirements and goals.

ec76f926-july-core-newsletter-image
Aperçus

Regulatory Compliance Items to Consider as Part of Transactional Due Diligence

juillet 19, 2022

Performing a limited environmental regulatory review can identify potential deficiencies with the environmental management of an acquisition.

c20ba008-microsoftteams-image-18
Aperçus

Support an Integrated EHS/ESG Management System

juin 10, 2022

While a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) is a common method for identifying environmental liabilities during transactional due diligence, the ASTM International standard for Phase I ESAs (E1527-13, with proposed E1527-21 awaiting adoption) omits regulatory compliance from its scope. For properties containing operations that may be applicable to environmental compliance regulations, performing a limited environmental regulatory review can identify potential deficiencies with the environmental management of the facility. A limited environmental compliance review typically evaluates the presence of material findings that may exist in a facility’s management of its environmental compliance requirements. Material findings are defined as a condition of non-compliance that could necessitate expenditures, not including attorney fees or regulatory agency penalties, in excess of a specified dollar amount or materiality threshold. The materiality threshold is based on the client’s risk tolerance and is often in the range of $50,000. However, this amount is arbitrary and can be revised as appropriate. Non-material deficiencies, those identified below the materiality threshold, would still require action but are within the client’s risk tolerance.

b517ce45-manage-ehs-esg-risks-blog
Aperçus

How to Use an Integrated Approach To Manage EHS and ESG Risks

avril 20, 2022

While a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) is a common method for identifying environmental liabilities during transactional due diligence, the ASTM International standard for Phase I ESAs (E1527-13, with proposed E1527-21 awaiting adoption) omits regulatory compliance from its scope. For properties containing operations that may be applicable to environmental compliance regulations, performing a limited environmental regulatory review can identify potential deficiencies with the environmental management of the facility. A limited environmental compliance review typically evaluates the presence of material findings that may exist in a facility’s management of its environmental compliance requirements. Material findings are defined as a condition of non-compliance that could necessitate expenditures, not including attorney fees or regulatory agency penalties, in excess of a specified dollar amount or materiality threshold. The materiality threshold is based on the client’s risk tolerance and is often in the range of $50,000. However, this amount is arbitrary and can be revised as appropriate. Non-material deficiencies, those identified below the materiality threshold, would still require action but are within the client’s risk tolerance.

esa-standard
Mises à jour réglementaires

New Phase I ESA Standard Will Affect Environmental Due Diligence

janvier 25, 2022

After years of review, revisions and discussions, the new ASTM E1527 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Phase I ESA) standard has been published. The new standard includes updates to definitions, clarifications on processes and requirements, and guidance for emerging contaminants.

GettyImages-2155903870
Livres blancs/rapports

Managing EHS & ESG Risks Through Integrated Systems Today and Beyond

juillet 22, 2021

It has been more than 50 years since the development and establishment of the federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the federal Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA) which were formed to protect our environment and workplaces across the United States. Significant laws, policies and regulations followed to establish the “regulatory programs” that all applicable businesses and entities must address and meet to ensure these compliance-driven legislative programs would create a foundation to protect our society.

2f472652-bristol-uk-banner
Aperçus

Impacts environnementaux de la transition vers les énergies renouvelables

mai 15, 2021

La transition vers les sources d’énergie renouvelables aura des répercussions environnementales et économiques notables. Pour comprendre les implications possibles, vous aurez besoin d’une connaissance de base de la façon dont les combustibles fossiles affectent l’environnement.

GettyImages-509848898
Aperçus

Controlling volatile organic emissions from RCRA hazardous waste activities

mai 14, 2021

EPA identifies National Compliance Initiative FY2020-2023 for reducing hazardous air emissions from hazardous waste facilities.

140de023-trc-pfas-sampling-advisory-on-aqueous-samples
Aperçus

PFAS Sampling Advisory on Aqueous Samples

avril 1, 2021

Advisory on collecting aqueous samples (e.g., groundwater, wastewater, stormwater, etc.) for PFAS analysis.

GettyImages-1367487978-1
Mises à jour réglementaires

Interim Guidance on Destruction and Disposal of PFAS & Materials Containing PFAS

février 19, 2021

Interim Guidance from EPA identifies 6 materials that use or manufacture PFAS and approaches for disposal.

GettyImages-1472604391
Aperçus

EPA Issues PFAS Air Emissions Draft Test Method OTM-45

février 5, 2021

First Air Emissions Draft Test for the Measurement of Selected Per- and Polyfluorinated Alkyl Substances from Stationary Sources

GettyImages-177332436-a
Nouvelles

TRC Companies Inc. Expands Environmental and Renewable Energy Capabilities with the Acquisition of Shoener Environmental

Décembre 2, 2020

Today TRC Companies, announces the expansion of its environmental and renewable energy capabilities with the acquisition of Shoener Environmental.

GettyImages-1461816895
Vidéos

TRC Talks – Renewable Energy

novembre 24, 2020

Our experts discuss TRC’s integrated approach to renewable energy development.

GettyImages-525440707-a
Nouvelles

TRC Companies Inc. Acquires 1Source Safety and Health

novembre 11, 2020

TRC Companies (« TRC”), a leading technology-driven provider of end-to-end engineering, consulting and construction management solutions, has acquired 1Source Safety and Health, a firm that provides management consulting services in areas such as indoor air quality, asbestos management, industrial hygiene and safety management systems.

a1d45d3a-velthuisen_rachel
Rachel Velthuisen

Dr. Rachel Velthuisen, Senior Project Manager with TRC has over 17 years of extensive air quality compliance experience, with a proven track record for managing multiple projects and clients to deliver high quality results across a range of industries. She provides expertise in Title V compliance and permitting, NNSR analysis, PSD permitting, regulatory compliance assessment, air emission inventories, and state minor source air permitting. She has worked with a variety of industries including chemical and textile facilities, large seaports, steel mini-mills, power plants, biosolids handling processing facilities, commercial airlines and the aerospace industry, detergent manufacturers, oil and gas extraction facilities, glass manufacturers, renewable electric-generating facilities, forest products, pulp and paper manufacturers, distilleries, paint manufacturers, renewable natural gas sites, among others. Dr. Velthuisen's expertise lies in strategizing and leading multi-office teams to collectively provide client-focused and innovative solutions to complex air quality compliance challenges. She also leads TRC’s Air Management Services (AMS) PFAS group. Dr. Velthuisen has a Ph.D. and M.S. in Physical/Atmospheric Chemistry from the University of California, Irvine, and a B.S. in Chemistry from the University of Wisconsin, La Crosse.