Authors: Clint Miller, PhD, and Robert Stanforth, PhD | septembre 28, 2023

Piper Diagrams are a powerful data visualization tool, that have a variety of useful applications for electric generating facilities with Coal Combustion Residual (CCR) units, including developing Conceptual Site Models (CSM) and supporting alternative source demonstrations (ASD). Learn more about approaches to overcome the recognized limitations of Piper Diagrams and how to make the most of this valuable technique.

GettyImages-2121283783-a

CCR Rule Groundwater Monitoring Requirements

The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), enacted in 1976, addressed the management of hazardous waste and prescribes the means and methods to monitor hazardous (Subtitle C) and non-hazardous (Subtitle D) waste facilities, particularly landfills and storage sites, to assess potential contamination and protect water resources. The performance of groundwater monitoring under RCRA and subsequent amendments is required to demonstrate that human health and the environment are protected. Groundwater monitoring is an integral component of compliance under RCRA and the EPA’s 2015 Hazardous and Solid Waste Management System: Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities; Final Rule (40 CFR Part 257, the “CCR Rule”) and the proposed Legacy CCR Surface Impoundments rule (proposed rule) to amend the CCR Rule under § 257.94.

Under the CCR Rule, detection monitoring is one of the initial requirements, where a facility must monitor groundwater for statistically significant increases (SSIs) in the concentrations of the seven detection monitoring constituents (the Appendix III) above background concentrations in groundwater monitoring wells at a CCR unit, a legacy impoundment or CCR Management Unit (CCRMU) under the proposed rule. If there is a potential statistically significant increase (SSI), under § 257.94(e)(2), the facility must either initiate an assessment monitoring program under § 297.95 or perform an alternate source demonstration (ASD) to establish whether the potential SSI is due to either another groundwater source or an error in sampling, analysis, statistical evaluation, or natural variation in groundwater quality. The use of the Piper Diagram is a useful line of evidence (either “key” or “supporting”) when used in concert with other lines of evidence.

The Role of the Piper Diagram

The Piper Diagram–a graphical representation that allows geoscientists to analyze and interpret groundwater chemistry data—is a useful line of evidence (either “key” or “supporting”) for evaluating potential releases of CCR constituents when used in concert with other lines of evidence.

Laying out a framework to organize site characteristic information that helps with understanding fate and transport mechanisms at the early stages of a monitoring program is important to readily evaluate SSIs and alternate sources, if necessary. This involves developing a Conceptual Site Model (CSM), which is a key, base component in a CCR Rule compliance program that serves as a foundation for further investigation, analysis and decision-making that may arise throughout the groundwater monitoring program. Piper Diagrams are an invaluable tool in constructing the CSM by examining the chemical composition and variations in water samples and have historically been widely used by hydrogeologists and geochemists to analyze mixing of groundwater plumes.

GettyImages-1188858439-a

Limitations and New Approaches

Although Piper Diagrams are very useful, they are subject to limitations. As with any visualization tool, the Piper Diagram presents data in very specific ways which, if not performed properly, can lead to misapplication and misinterpretation of the visual presentation. In addition to simplified representation, other limitations include the use of ratios rather than concentrations; limited modeling of geochemical processes; data clustering; similarities in iconic concentrations from different sources; and data set considerations.

Piper Diagrams are a powerful data visualization tool, but with recognized limitations, that are useful for a variety of applications for electric generating facility with CCR units, including developing CSMs and supporting ASDs. Fortunately, these limitations can often be successfully addressed through the use of additional focused data assessments and geochemical modeling. While Piper Diagrams are not necessarily a stand-alone line of reasoning for a successful ASD, they are a viable technique to evaluate and visualize data in combination with additional lines of evidence demonstrating an alternate source. To further explore the utility and relevance of using Piper Diagrams as a line of reasoning for evaluating potential releases of CCR constituents from CCR units, and to learn more about suggested approaches to overcome these recognized limitations, download our White Paper below or contact us to discuss your specific needs.

Understanding Piper Diagrams: Applications and Limitations with Coal Combustion Residuals

S’adapter au
changement

Collaborez avec les praticiens testés de TRC

Contact Us

Partager nos perspectives

Nos praticiens partagent leurs idées et leurs points de vue sur les tendances et les défis qui façonnent le marché.

coal-power-plant-factory-643293310-edit1-1-scaled-min
Aperçus

Ancienne règle du CCR : Planifier à l’avance pour la surveillance des CCMR

octobre 18, 2024

Le 8 mai 2024, l’Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) des États-Unis a publié la version finale du Système de gestion des déchets dangereux et solides : Élimination des résidus de combustion du charbon des services publics d’électricité.

b8f687b1-coal-power-plant-sunset
Livres blancs/rapports

Understanding Piper Diagrams: Applications and Limitations with Coal Combustion Residuals

septembre 28, 2023

Learn more about approaches to overcome the recognized limitations of Piper Diagrams and how to make the most of this valuable technique.

98bf3ae3-coalash-2015
Nouvelles

Proposed Coal Combustion Residuals Legacy CCR Surface Impoundments Rule – Status of Public Comments

juillet 31, 2023

TRC has submitted public comments related to EPA’s proposed compliance timeline and schedule.

268f59fe-power-plant-from-coal-993346578
Livres blancs/rapports

Summary of Proposed Coal Combustion Residuals Legacy CCR Surface Impoundments Rule

juin 8, 2023

TRC’s extensive background in CCR compliance support under the current CCR rule helps our clients get in front of these new regulations.

a1a97d18-brand-new-coal-power-plant-489110302
Aperçus

EPA Provides New Coal Combustion Residual Expectations

octobre 6, 2022

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) highlighted new Coal Combustion Residual (CCR) compliance expectations.

trc-coal-ash-management
Mises à jour réglementaires

EPA Coal Ash Compliance Expectations Updated

mars 28, 2022

New EPA Communications highlight new Coal Combustion Residual compliance expectations, a shift from the current program.

67ac0246-ccr-groundwater-compliance-southeast
Aperçus

CCR Removal and Its Effects on Soil and Groundwater Geochemistry

octobre 25, 2021

Many utilities are implementing corrective action at coal combustion residual (CCR) surface impoundments under Federal or State CCR Regulations, with implications for groundwater protection standards.

GettyImages-1253487317
Aperçus

Consider a CCR Audit as the Assessment & Plan Deadline Approaches

juillet 8, 2021

With the upcoming five-year periodic assessment and plan deadlines rapidly approaching for landfills and surface impoundments, power generators subject to the CCR Rule should also consider audits to ensure their facility records and external-facing web sites are complete and documents are up-to-date.

GettyImages-1492439239
Aperçus

TRC In Manchester – 1 Year Later

janvier 25, 2021

In January 2020 we opened our second UK office in Manchester. One year later, we reflect on our first year of business, a year that presented the world with unprecedented challenges.

GettyImages-1457369699
Vidéos

Breakthrough Solutions for Coal Combustion Residuals Compliance

septembre 3, 2020

TRC is your trusted partner, helping to navigate the economic, environmental and regulatory pressures as well as the rapid technological advancements impacting successful coal ash management.

d99df596-trc-coal-ash-solar-sites
Aperçus

Why Coal Ash Impoundments and Landfills Make Great Solar Sites

septembre 25, 2019

Hundreds of coal ash sites are set to close over the next decade and could make ideal, low-impact locations for utility-scale solar farms.

GettyImages-1359747893
Médias

Successful Coal Ash Pond Management

juillet 10, 2014

Regulatory requirements, plant retirements, changes to facility operational profiles, environmental liability management and political and social pressures are among the factors driving utilities to close or consider closing their coal ash ponds.

c4e1ca0e-trc-clint-miller
Clint Miller

Dr. Clint Miller is an expert geochemist with over 11 years of experience in environmental consulting. He currently serves as the Advanced Characterization & In-Situ Remediation CORE Team Lead in the Engineering, Construction, and Remediation (ECR) practice. During his career, he has been involved in projects across the globe, including Arctic Siberia, Chile, Greece, Japan, Papua New Guinea, Philippines, Syria, Taiwan, and the United States. He has significant remediation experience with chlorinated solvents, coal combustion residuals (CCRs), metals, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), pesticides and fertilizers, semi/volatile organic compounds, and many other contaminants in soils, groundwater, surface water, and sediments. Dr. Miller’s background includes extensive service to public and private-sector clientele including expert witness, remedy screen, and cost-to-closure estimates. Contact Clint at CMMiller@trccompanies.com